By: Clay Duncan, Staff Member
The
recreational and environmental value provided by state parks across the U.S. is
soon to be diminished due to lack of funding. State budget cuts are resulting in closures of many parks
nationwide, as well as a reduction in operations in many that will remain open.[1] Despite their perception as mere places
of leisure, state parks are important national attractions whose continued
maintenance is important to the preservation of America’s emphasis on
environmental upkeep. With funds
scarce and expenses rising, states must become creative with ways to get the
necessary money to keep these parks alive.
California
closed a whopping 70 parks, while Arizona cut funding to parks completely.[2] Other states have made multimillion
dollar cuts to funding previously allocated to state park maintenance.[3] The necessity of these closures is not
for lack of attendance nationally, as U.S. state parks saw a 14 million visitor
increase from 2009 to 2010.[4] What’s more, state parks are fairly
large employers in a country troubled with unemployment, providing some 270,000
jobs across the country.[5]
A
likely reason for these budget cuts to state parks is that states do not
receive matching funds from the federal government for the funds it spends on
them,[6]
thus such spending equates to a dollar for dollar reduction in money that could
be used elsewhere. Even those
federal programs that have provided funding for state parks are at risk of
being eliminated.[7] One such program is the Recreational
Trails Program, which “provides funds to the States to develop and maintain
recreational trails and trail-related facilities for both nonmotorized and
motorized recreational trail uses.”[8]
To
make up for the loss in funding once provided by the budgets, some states have
resorted to raising fees in exchange for unlimited parks access,[9]
and seeking corporate and nonprofit partnerships by offering them advertising
opportunities and control over operations.[10] In Ohio and Pennsylvania, legislation
has been introduced which proposes leasing state park land to oil and gas
drillers.[11] Proponents of the legislation see it as
a necessary measure to raise the requisite funds for much needed park projects,
while skeptics see such a move exposing parks to corporate greed.[12]
State
funding is scarce in most areas of the country, so budgetary cutbacks rarely
come as a surprise. But if an
effective replacement for this source of money is not found and state park
closures proceed as projected, Americans will soon be deprived of great
opportunities to see this country’s natural landscape.
[i] Douglas Shinkle, Parks in Peril, National Conference of State Legislatures (Jan.
2012), http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/env-res/parks-in-peril.aspx.
[ii] Id.
[iii] Id.
[iv] Id.
[v] Id.
[vi] Shinkle, supra note 1.
[vii] Id.
[viii] Recreational
Trails Program, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway
Administration, http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/recreational_trails/index.cfm
(last updated Apr. 27, 2012).
[ix] Shinkle, supra note 1.
[x] Id.
[xi] Id.
That is such a good idea and we hope lots of people take advantage of it. We have never seen anything like that advertised around here.
ReplyDelete