By: Jessica Durden, Staff Member
The
embattled coal states, already stressed by the rise of the natural gas
industry, were dealt another blow when the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit upheld an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
mandate to fiercely limit greenhouse-gas emissions.[1] The Court fully supported the EPA in
its finding that rising carbon dioxide emissions from the coal industry and
other utility providers have “likely been responsible for global warming over
the past half century.”[2] The ruling piggybacked on a 2007 Supreme
Court ruling that the EPA had power under the Clean Air Act to regulate
greenhouse-gas emissions.[3]
In a
heated election year, such a dramatic ruling could hurt the incumbent President
Obama in his election efforts.
Obama lost Kentucky and West Virginia, two major mining states, in 2008.[4] Peppered along the highways in West Virginia are billboards declaring that the
coal corridor is Obama’s “No Job Zone,” and West Virginia democrats have
withheld support for the President because of his support for the EPA’s strict
regulations.[5] The 2012 polls in mining states were not in Mr. Obama’s favor
prior to this ruling, either. In
the Kentucky Democratic primary, 42 percent of registered and voting Kentucky
Democrats voted for “uncommitted,” and in West Virginia a shocking 41 percent
of state Democrats marked down a convicted felon’s name over Mr. Obama’s.[6] Kentucky’s primary vote result
particularly shocked industry experts because there was not even another option
on the ballot.[7]
These
results are not entirely shocking, since Obama did not take these states in
2008 and was not projected to this year, but for a swing state like Ohio, this
ruling could have major implications. Presumed Republican
presidential candidate Mitt Romney has already jumped on the opportunity to
gain favor in coal-dependent Ohio by launching an energy-focused campaign in
the state.[8] In an incredible streak, Ohio has
picked the winner of the presidential election every year since 1964, and
recent polls still put Mr. Obama ahead of Mr. Romney.[9] But this recent ruling gives Mr. Romney
a strategic opening to appeal to the many industrial workers in Ohio struggling
to get on board with the demands of the EPA. If the Romney camp convinces Ohio, it is possible to win the
state—and therefore win the nation in November.
[1] Brett
Kendall, Court Backs EPA on
Warming, Wall. St. J., June
26, 2012, at A1.
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] Election
Results 2008, NY Times, (Dec. 9, 2008), http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/map.html.
[5] Mark
Caserta, Will W.Va. become an
Obama “no-job” zone?, Huntington
Herald-dispatch, (June 21,
2012), http://www.herald-dispatch.com/opinions/x1805694144/Will-W-Va-become-an-Obama-no-job-zone.
[6] Aaron
Blake, Obama loses 40 percent of
the primary vote in Arkansas, Kentucky, (Wash.
Post, May 22, 2012), http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/obama-loses-more-than-40-percent-of-kentucky-primary-voters-to-uncommitted-option/2012/05/22/gIQAlYHEjU_blog.html.
[7] Id.
[8] See
Kendall at A1.
[9] Tom
Troy, Obama, Romney camps pull out
all stops in Ohio, Toledo Blade,(
July 1, 2012), http://www.toledoblade.com/Politics/2012/07/01/Obama-Romney-camps-pull-out-all-stops-in-Ohio.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment